Homepage
Products
Video Gallery
RSW Reviews
Instructions
F.A.Q.
Shipping Options
Return Policy
Weaponry Knowledge
Activities
Sparring Rules
Sparring Tips
About
The Crew
Contact
Links of Interest |
Sword Architecture
-
Despite
public belief, the broader the blade doesn't equal to the heavier the sword and
the narrower the blade doesn't equal to the lighter the sword either. This
misconception was formed when people look at the sword through 2-dimensions
photos and haven't inspected their thickness. Actually, the narrower the
blade, the thicker it is. On contrary, the broader the blade, the thinner it
is.
|
Many people assumes some medieval
European swords were thick and heavy because of their broad blade
profile. However, they were actually thin.
|
-
The wavy
line visible on a
Japanese Katana
is called "Hamon". It's the
differentiation area between the martensite steel structure at the edge and
the pearlite steel structure at the sides and spine. Martensite structure is
hard but brittle that's good for keeping the edge sharp, while pearlite
structure is soft but tough that's good to absorb shocking power during
strikes. Different styles of smith school favor different "Hamon" patterns.
Usually during wartime, the "Hamon" were straight and simple because of the
urgency. However, the better "Hamon" patterns come with many semi-circle so
that in case the edge suffers damage, it chips off in semi-circle shape and
does not form a sharp angle crack that will jeopardize the blade's integrity.
-
Despite
the use of Wootz steel (true Damascus steel) in the middle east region,
European swords were sought after by Arabian nobles and other inhabitants of
the area. It was also sought after in Japan after the connection had been
established since 16th century. Although European swords were designed to
have softer edges than Japanese and Wootz swords, they were tough and
reliable even under the most difficult situation because they were made to
survive the extreme cold weather where steel would become brittle. Moreover,
the ore in Europe were good.
-
A
sharper sword is not always better. The sharper a sword is, the more prone
to damage it is. A sword has to be sharp, but it cannot risk developing a
crack upon the first few contact by going overly sharp. Some 10th century
Viking antique swords are sharp enough to cut paper when they were
rediscovered. On the other hand, some battlefield
Katana was blunt enough to
be taken as a steel rod. The reason behind is that Viking sword fighting
style involves the use of shield and the sword did not have to parry
incoming attacks, so it can stay as sharp as possible. However,
Katana were
used without a shield and to survive the contact, its edge has to be
thicker.
|